ขอต้อนรับ ผู้มาเยือน กรุณา ล็อกอิน หรือ สมัครสมาชิก
Did you miss your activation email?

ล็อกอินด้วยชื่อผู้ใช้ รหัสผ่่าน และระยะเวลาใช้งาน

มีน้ำใจ ไม่อวดตัว มั่วไม่ทำ

...

เสรีภาพทางการศึกษาคือหัวใจของการศึกษาที่แท้จริง

คนแรกที่ควรได้รับการศึกษาคือผู้ให้การศึกษา

mPEC on Facebook

IPhO 2011 on Facebook

IPhO 2011

Further Academy
 
Advanced search

37976 Posts in 5626 Topics- by 4058 Members - Latest Member: Echelon
Pages: 1   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: 4.23  (Read 472 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
pisa
neutrino
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26


« on: July 28, 2010, 04:25:47 PM »

4.23 Which of the followings are conservative force.

a) \mathbf{F} = k(x,2y,3z)
\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_x &=& \dfrac{\partial F_z}{\partial y} - \dfrac{\partial F_y}{\partial z} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}(3kz) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}(2ky) \\ &=& 0\end{array}

In this case, the other 2 components will give the same results.
So, we can conclude that   \nabla \times \mathbf{F} = 0  The given force is conservative force.

\begin{array}{rcl} U(\mathbf{r}) &=& - \int_0^r{\mathbf{F}(r)}d\mathbf{r} \\ &=& - \int_0^r{[F_xdx + F_ydy + F_zdz]}  \\ &=& -k{\int_{0}^{x}xdx +\int_{0}^{y}2ydy + \int_{0}^{z}3zdz} \\ &=& -k(\dfrac{1}{2}x^2 + y^2 + \dfrac{3}{2}z^2)  \end{array}

U(\mathbf{r}) = -\dfrac{1}{2}k(x^2, 2y^2 , 3z^2)


ิb) \mathbf{F} = k(y,x,0)
\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_x &=& \dfrac{\partial F_z}{\partial y} - \dfrac{\partial F_y}{\partial z} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}(0) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}(x) \\ &=& 0\end{array}

\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_y &=& \dfrac{\partial F_z}{\partial x} - \dfrac{\partial F_x}{\partial z} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}(0) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}(y) \\ &=& 0\end{array}

\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_z &=& \dfrac{\partial F_y}{\partial x} - \dfrac{\partial F_x}{\partial y} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}(x) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}(y) \\ &=& 1-1 \\ &=& 0 \end{array}

So, we can obviously see that   \nabla \times \mathbf{F} = 0  The given force is conservative force.

\begin{array}{rcl} U(\mathbf{r}) &=& - \int_0^r{\mathbf{F}(r)}d\mathbf{r} \\ &=& - \int_0^r{[F_xdx + F_ydy + F_zdz]}  \\ &=& -k{\int_{0}^{x}xdx +\int_{0}^{y}ydy} \\ &=& -k(\dfrac{1}{2}x^2 + \dfrac{1}{2}y^2 )  \end{array}

U(\mathbf{r}) = -\dfrac{1}{2}k(x^2, y^2 , 0)


c) \mathbf{F} = k(-y,x,0)
\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_x &=& \dfrac{\partial F_z}{\partial y} - \dfrac{\partial F_y}{\partial z} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}(0) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}(x) \\ &=& 0\end{array}

\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_y &=& \dfrac{\partial F_z}{\partial x} - \dfrac{\partial F_x}{\partial z} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}(0) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial z}(-y) \\ &=& 0\end{array}

\begin{array}{rcl} (\nabla \times \mathbf{F})_z &=& \dfrac{\partial F_y}{\partial x} - \dfrac{\partial F_x}{\partial y} \\ &=& \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}(x) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial y}(-y) \\ &=& 1-(-1) \\ &=& 2 \end{array}

So, As wee see that   \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \neq  0  The given force is non-conservative force.
We can not write the formula for U(r).


P.Buphamalai 5205086
Logged
Pages: 1   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

คุณสมบัติของเด็กดี

ไม่ฟังเวลามีการนินทากัน ไม่มองหาข้อด้อยของผู้อื่น ไม่พูดนินทาเหยีบบย่ำผู้อื่น